Banning Books ?

Should schools ban books based on certain topics?

I disagree with this statement, because in school you are supposed to use books. In school books are a HUGE advantage in learning. Books were meant for school. There are books that are meant for actual learning in classes, and there are books that are for the pleasure of reading. Some examples of brands that PRODUCE  books meant for actual learning are Reading Street, McGraw Hill Education, etc. Some places that PUBLISH books that other people wrote that are meant for reading as a pleasure are Penguin Random House, Hachette Livre, etc. You would think that people would NEVER, EVER ban books from school, because… well… they’re everywhere in a school. In most schools they have libraries that are full of books all different kinds. Fantasy, mystery, nonfiction, etc. Once again these books are meant for a reading pleasure. But there are books that are essential to a child’s learning. These books would be found in a classroom or they might also be found in a library. Even though some topics aren’t the most fun to talk about, schools shouldn’t banned these books entirely. There are books that little kids would read, and they aren’t banned, but there are books that are critical to learning, and they are banned. I’m sorry, what ? Why would you ban a book that is extremely important to somebody’s learning but you wouldn’t ban a little kids book. What’s the difference ? Comment what you think about this statement. Happy Blogging !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top
Skip to toolbar